The Explanation for QB ID: 320386 is confusing (at least for me). It starts out by converting the 100 KIAS into TAS and GS then calculates the

Instead the Explanation states that "The CQB answer is clearly wrong" and then proceeds to "prove this by taking the ROC from the graph 1080 fpm" to work out the "Ground Dist" - a rather complex method that includes conversions from ft>nm>ft. Was this calculation necessary to arrive at the "close enough" answer or is it just another (complex) method? This does not appear to be consistent with the Explanation given in QB ID: 320385 or the example in CAP 698 where the same formula (

Appreciate any assistance in clarifying this.

Rgds.....ageorgea

*"Still Air Distance"*as**14948ft**. (No issues up to that point!). However, it goes not continue to calculate the*"Ground Distance"*using the formula in CAP 698 para 3.2.3 (e) which outlines*"Ground Distance = Still Air Dist x GS/TAS"*(**14948 x 113/108 =**- the correct answer shown in the QB).**1**5640ftInstead the Explanation states that "The CQB answer is clearly wrong" and then proceeds to "prove this by taking the ROC from the graph 1080 fpm" to work out the "Ground Dist" - a rather complex method that includes conversions from ft>nm>ft. Was this calculation necessary to arrive at the "close enough" answer or is it just another (complex) method? This does not appear to be consistent with the Explanation given in QB ID: 320385 or the example in CAP 698 where the same formula (

*"Ground Distance = Still Air Dist x GS/TAS")*is used . Am I missing something here????Appreciate any assistance in clarifying this.

Rgds.....ageorgea

## Comment